Over 59425

Scalia Politics

Hypocrisy, Thy Name Is Democrat -

RACIAL ENTITLEMENT - Now where did I hear that crazy idea before?

VOTING - A RACIAL ENTITLEMENT?? - Since when are equal voting rights an "entitlement?"

VOTING RIGHTS - In danger again.

CONSERVATIVE VALUES - Civil rights is not on their list of priorities.

YEAH... - That's about right.

CONSERVATIVE VALUES - Taking America back to the 19th Century.

Flashback To 1992: Biden Says Bush Should "Not Name A Nominee Until After The November Election" -

Obama & Scalia's Funeral -

Obama's Nefarious Priorities -

Constitution -


Detestable Display Of Liberal Intolerance & Abhorrence -

Breaking News: Highest Court in Existence overrules Highest Court in the land in landmark decision! -

Republicans in Congress -

TAGS: mitch mcconnell supreme court scalia
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 28, 2016, 5:54 pm
calron - February 26, 2016, 2:43 am
I actually did mention that it didn't seem that you meant what you literally said with the "should" line, but you kinda ignored that and plowed ahead as if I didn't. P.S. I was raised by wolves so my English is a bit off. :P
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 11:08 am
root c a n a l
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 11:08 am
As for the rest, I a**ume you FINALLY got my 'humble' opinion on this. You don't have to take the root ca*** approach every time with my opinion, if you are truly curious. You could always just ask next time? Cheers
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 11:06 am
In other words, I'm fine with comments on the fly. I trust you and others to get the meaning of it. Not hard.
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 11:05 am
If English is a 2nd language to me, what is your excuse, Mr.Wrait full! Sry, couldn't resist X-D Seriously, though...it's a comment board. Read between the lines and the gist of it. You're clever kid. Sure you could figure out what I meant.
calron - February 25, 2016, 2:29 am
And as the constitution provide that president get to "nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate" so they have a clear authority for to consent and act like little children and throwing tantrums for not getting their way.
calron - February 25, 2016, 2:24 am
Should: used to indicate obligation, duty, or correctness, typically when criticizing someone's actions. Misuse of the word would explain a lot. As you have done so frequently, it makes me wonder is English is a second language to you?
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:49 am
And if the GOP continues with the high horse nonsense, the truth is that the constitution is a lil'more on the side of the President to fill this vacancy than that of the GOP to obstruct it. It's a losing argument from sore losers. My 2 cents.
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:47 am
However,I'm making fun of the whining and the phony claims of constitutional this-and-that from the GOP. Their high horse isn't higher than Obama's.Both sides should simply concede that their political interests are at impasse and may the best man win,etc
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:44 am
Again, I don't blame them for obstructing possible Obama's nominee. The dems would/should do the same if facing the same dilemma.And you'd be lying if you told me that the GOP wouldn't sing a different tune if roles were reversed "as they should"
calron - February 24, 2016, 2:17 am
You didn't address what they should do, you addressed what the constitution says and got it wrong. They are allowed to both advise and consent which the the authority they are allowed to use to be unethical hypocritical obstructionists. "as they should"
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 12:47 am
There is nothing in the Constitution that says they can't take a crap on the floor while doing a hand stand. Doesn't mean they should.
calron - February 23, 2016, 2:29 am
Funny as they are constitutionally allowed to just not vote on an nominee.

"The Framers would've framed it this way!" -

The is only one person in this world dumber than Raphael "Ted" Cruz -

TAGS: raphael ted cruz scalia palin
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 21, 2016, 11:31 pm
Breaking the 4th wall of sorts, meme-style, meh
fauxnews - February 21, 2016, 11:29 pm
Yeah, dumb typo.
tommygun - February 21, 2016, 11:25 pm
Did you mean "There" is only one person?
calron - February 21, 2016, 9:51 pm
Hey, you're the one that limited the number of people that like him to one.
fauxnews - February 20, 2016, 2:54 am
ph**os = p h o t o s
fauxnews - February 20, 2016, 2:51 am
calron - February 20, 2016, 2:40 am
So only one person in the whole world can like him at once? :P

Scalia Agrees! -

TAGS: scalia dies 2016 obama supreme
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - February 19, 2016, 2:03 am
I don't recall them ever saying that a president cannot. Rather they use an Appeal to Tradition.

Bullsh*tting. -

TAGS: grassley supreme court scalia obamacare
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 15, 2016, 1:41 pm
fauxnews - February 15, 2016, 1:32 pm
And he was "confirmed" during, wait for it...AN ELECTION YEAR 1988 X-D Not appointed/confirmed a year before *cough* -ahem liar
fauxnews - February 15, 2016, 1:21 pm
On November 30, 1987, Kennedy was nominated
Olympusmanager - February 15, 2016, 1:16 pm
Kennedy was appointed the year before so this meme is totally misleading and false. in other words, a lie.
Bandit5906 - February 15, 2016, 11:02 am
In 1960 the Dems passed a resolution preventing a appointment of a justice during a presidential election year.

Ding dong the wicked B***H is Dead. -

Ego -

TAGS: scalia dies ego
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 16, 2016, 11:18 am
I got this one Alex for $400. Who is Antonin Scalia? :-D
calron - February 16, 2016, 2:52 am
See poster 61854.

Teatards, Your God has spoken! -

TAGS: scalia reagan obamacare kennedy election
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 6:30 pm
calron - February 25, 2016, 2:17 am
So playing the shadow game again, "Both are operating out of political self-interest, as they should, duh." contradicts you're statement just before that quote and you saying reps shouldn't in another thread.
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 2:09 pm
Thanks :-)
truthteller - February 24, 2016, 2:00 pm
maybe Gore has a point about methane causing global warming. after all that bull **** I waded through, all I got from him was a bunch of h** air ... The fire breath was a nice touch by the way. catch you later
truthteller - February 24, 2016, 1:45 pm
woah.you shouldnt take this stuff so seriously Al.He was just sharing his opinion about politicians.no wonder you're blowing your fuse bro.Trying to be the accountability police for the opinions of others must be tiring.Starting to sound like Hillary too
truthteller - February 24, 2016, 1:30 pm
wow, he really pushed your bu ttons there Mr.Vice President. heh heh
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 10:08 am
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 10:08 am
calron - February 24, 2016, 2:12 am
In the end you state that is not how it should be and yet refuse to actually address that you said that they should act that way, even calling a direct quote as putting word in your mouth.
calron - February 24, 2016, 2:09 am
Strange how you talked about some aspect of myself rather than what we are talking about to explain why things and failed to address your contradiction of complaining how things are and saying that is how they should be by saying your not a politician.
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 1:08 am
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 1:07 am
And I've brought acceptance to that and given up hope that things can be solved in politics.But I still believe in voting.So I vote for the lesser of two evils.Obama or McCain may be corrupt.But they're saints next to the Trumps or Palin.My 2 cents (2/2)
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 1:04 am
So,with your bulverism out of the way, my 'opinion' is this:I think ALL politicians are corrupt creatures of self-interesr with rare exception.The best you can hope for is to choose one who matches you in your own ego or self-interest.(1/2)
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 1:02 am
In other words,its more about your fixation/agenda with me. It is my opinion,after all.You're telling me what my opinion is?Funny.My opinion belongs to me.If you really cared about it,then why not ask me to clarify it rather than put words in my mouth?
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 12:55 am
But that's the thing...I'm not a politician. Just a random bloke bantering about politics. So what you think I said is inconsequential,I'm not running for anything. Your obsession with my opinion simply highlights that reality.
calron - February 23, 2016, 2:50 am
"Both are operating out of political self-interest, as they should, duh." Your statement supporting the very thing you are against. So your whole statement is just dancing obscuring the point much like a politician.
fauxnews - February 21, 2016, 11:29 pm
I'm not a politician. I'm not having anything. Just voicing an opinion. The paradox you are struggling with is that of politics itself and politicians, it is not mine
calron - February 21, 2016, 9:55 pm
But you did say that the main cause of it being broken was how it should be. Now if you did so by accident or something I can understand, but it looks like you trying to have it both ways.
fauxnews - February 20, 2016, 2:52 am
Which is why the current state of politics suck...I never said I think the system ain't broken.
calron - February 20, 2016, 2:48 am
One cannot serve two masters.
fauxnews - February 19, 2016, 10:49 am
A politician's self-interest should be that of the constituent's that elected him/her IMAO.
calron - February 19, 2016, 1:58 am
You didn't really imply it, you stated it directly, as that was a quote.
TheConservativeInsurgent - February 18, 2016, 10:42 pm
Reagan's first choice, Robert Bork, was voted down by Democrats in October 1987. VP Joe Biden had a very different opinion on the Senate’s ability to block a president’s nominee "at all costs" back then. DEMOCRAT = HYPOCRITE
fauxnews - February 18, 2016, 10:36 am
Did imply that. I'm just realistic.
calron - February 18, 2016, 2:09 am
I disagree with the "as they should" part. They are elected to serve the people, not to serve themselves.
fauxnews - February 17, 2016, 2:36 am
See comment #79217.
fauxnews - February 17, 2016, 2:35 am
My point exactly, which is by both sides (not just one side) should stop whining and STFU. Both are operating out of political self-interest, as they should, duh.
CheGuevara - February 17, 2016, 2:31 am
*sorry - should have been wall street journal, not NYT *
CheGuevara - February 17, 2016, 2:31 am
Try Joe Biden and Bork in your search engine of choice. Nice NYT article with the headline "How Joe Biden Wrecked the Judicial Confirmation Process" [http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB124294934268945409]
calron - February 17, 2016, 2:27 am
A politician said it when it supported what he wanted to happen, must be true :P
fauxnews - February 17, 2016, 12:34 am
Grassley is the REPUBLICAN chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the panel that holds high-profile hearings for Supreme Court nominees.(2/2)
fauxnews - February 17, 2016, 12:33 am
“The reality is that the Senate has never stopped confirming judicial nominees during the last few months of a president’s term...The Thurmond Rule...plain bunk.” U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley July 14th, 2008 (1/2)
CheGuevara - February 16, 2016, 10:18 pm
"We should not confirm any Bush nominee to the Supreme Court, except in extraordinary circumstances," Schumer, a New York Democrat, said in prepared remarks to the American Constitution Society, a liberal legal organization.

Butthurt is covered under Obamacare! -

TAGS: scalia obama nominating
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Bandit5906 - February 15, 2016, 11:29 am
Push back will prevent this!

X-mas comes early to liberals -

Bwahahahaha! -

TAGS: scalia died hell karma
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 14, 2016, 4:55 pm
No doubt, for an activist judge (who was dishonest about it) he was quite the character. Can't say I miss him, and I'm not alone in that sentiment. And I won't deny the karma timing of this either(hence my memes). But he won't be forgotten,so there's that
fauxnews - February 14, 2016, 4:49 pm
As for Scalia he was proud to be an a-hole and died that way. He was incredibly intelligent and deserves kudos for his political successes, no doubt about it. He was also a rabid h*mophobic scoundrel, so forgive me for my lack of empathy at his passing
fauxnews - February 14, 2016, 4:45 pm
Gut-wrenching, spitting-mad, seeing-red absolute hatred, I mean real, pure unadulterated hate is Trump 24/7 (i.e.calls hispanics rapists, hates Muslims for sport,lies for sport). The American right is no angel in his, he's the GOP frontrunner FFS
Cyberhagen - February 14, 2016, 4:37 pm
Exactly. All in all, I see far more actual gut-wrenching, spitting-mad, seeing-red absolute hatred, I mean real, pure unadulterated hate, from the Left than I do the Right.
Libertas - February 14, 2016, 4:20 pm
They haven't even put him in the ground yet and the spew from the left is showing how hateful and disgusting the left is... its very pathetic to think that political differences of opinion can incite such hate and venom
Cyberhagen - February 14, 2016, 12:44 pm
Another appeal to compassion from your party of tolerance? Even Ruth Bader Ginsberg considered him a very close friend.

Antonin Scalia -

TAGS: antonin scalia supreme court justice g** marriage dissent
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

fauxnews - June 28, 2015, 1:19 pm
Nope. He actually DID say that - [email protected] pg.6- "Not a single South Westerner or even, to tell the truth, a genuine Westerner (California doesn't count.)" http://documents.latimes.com/supreme-court-rules-g**-marriage/#document/p74/a224855
Cyberhagen - June 28, 2015, 12:12 pm
While the overall sentiment has some legal merit, I rather doubt he said "California does not count"; I'm also pretty sure he knows how to spell "partisan".

S C A L I A -

TAGS: scalia supreme g** marriage dissent
Rating: 3.97/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Zeitguy - June 30, 2015, 6:49 pm
You do realize that you continue to prove my point with your response.?
ipaprime - June 30, 2015, 9:01 am
and now frequently based on such genetic markers as blood groups. Another definition of race. That makes 2 out of around 16.
ipaprime - June 30, 2015, 9:00 am
. a classification of modern humans, sometimes, esp. formerly, based on an arbitrary selection of physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape,
ipaprime - June 30, 2015, 8:55 am
Considering there is only 1 human race and not several, I do believe you are the 1 needing a clue.
Zeitguy - June 29, 2015, 10:57 pm
Racist: race : to dash, run, hurry: suffix ist: one that performs specified action, so therefor based on your logic...... Semantics, recognized by most people with a clue Ipa.
fauxnews - June 29, 2015, 12:14 pm
Cheers Ipa :-)
fauxnews - June 29, 2015, 12:14 pm
However, as long as others recognize that hated of others based on ***ual orientation is as a bad as racism, then I could care less what "word" is used.Hopefully this isn't another Republican denier argument - "g.ay hate NO exist and IS STUPID.derp!"(2/2)
fauxnews - June 29, 2015, 12:11 pm
Well, I was asking Cyberhagen. I wanted to know why HE thought the word was "stupid." But if you are going to answer for him (lol), then - I never denied, linguistically, that the word is slang or even sloppy (read: borderline derogatory) (1/2)
ipaprime - June 29, 2015, 9:45 am
there for homophobia means a fear of humanity.
ipaprime - June 29, 2015, 9:45 am
-phobia; a combining form meaning “fear,” occurring in loanwords from Greek
ipaprime - June 29, 2015, 9:43 am
Homo;(italics) the genus of bipedal primates that includes modern humans and several extinct forms, distinguished by their large brains and a dependence upon tools.
fauxnews - June 28, 2015, 1:05 pm
Why is it stupid? Explain.
Cyberhagen - June 28, 2015, 12:08 pm
"Homophobic".. possibly the most stupid term ever coined, but widely used in the 21st century.

Antonin Scalia -